Critical Thinking and Media Literacy · Lesson 8 of 8 · 12 min
Disagreeing Well and Changing Your Mind
You will meet people with very different views at university, at work and online, especially in a country as diverse as the UAE. Disagreeing respectfully, and being willing to change your mind when the evidence is strong, are signs of a confident thinker.
Intellectual humility
- The Greater Good Science Center describes intellectual humility as an "appropriate awareness of our intellectual limitations": recognising that your beliefs might be wrong, and holding them as firmly as the evidence allows.
- Scientific American describes it as being "the right size": neither arrogant nor self-deprecating, but open-minded, curious, realistic and teachable.
- It does not mean having no opinions, being "wishy-washy" or always agreeing (Scientific American).
- Research summarised by Greater Good links it to learning more, being more willing to look at opposing reasons, being more likely to fact-check false headlines, and viewing people who disagree more favourably.
The HEAR method for tough conversations
- Harvard researcher Julia Minson's HEAR framework helps people feel heard during disagreements.
- H: Hedge your claims. Soften certainty, for example "I think" or "in most cases", which signals you know others may see it differently.
- E: Emphasise agreement. Find shared values or goals first, such as "We both want what is fair for the team".
- A: Acknowledge the other view. Briefly restate their position: "So you're saying that..."
- R: Reframe to the positive. Avoid words like "no", "won't" and "don't" where you can, and say what you are for.
- In Minson's studies, people given brief training (in one study, a couple of minutes) were seen as more trustworthy and reasonable, and in an earlier study as more persuasive.
Steelman, do not straw man
- Before you argue against a view, try to state the strongest version of it, the one a thoughtful person would actually hold. Scientific American gives considering the merits of an alternative viewpoint as an example of intellectual humility.
- Ask questions to understand, not to trap: "What makes you see it that way?" or "What would change your mind?"
- Ask yourself the same question. Psychologist Mark Leary suggests pausing when you feel certain and asking, "Could I be wrong?" (Greater Good).
- Separate the idea from the person. You can disagree firmly with a view while being warm towards the person holding it.
Changing your mind gracefully
- Set a high bar for evidence, and then actually update your view when that bar is met (Scientific American).
- Phrases that help: "That's a good point, I hadn't thought of that", "I've changed my mind on this", "You've convinced me on part of it".
- Changing your mind on a fact is not losing. It means you now know something you did not know before.
- Respond to criticism without defensiveness: listen, ask what they mean, then decide calmly whether it is right.
Knowing when to step away
- Not every disagreement needs to be won or finished. If someone is insulting you or only wants an audience, it is fine to end the conversation politely.
- Online arguments in public comment sections rarely change minds. A private, calm message or a face-to-face chat usually works better.
- On topics such as religion, politics and culture, show respect for other people's beliefs and follow the laws and norms of the country you are in.
- Agreeing to disagree is a valid ending: "I see it differently, but I understand your view better now. Thanks for explaining."
Practise in real life
Tick each one off when you have done it.
- In your next disagreement with a friend or family member, use all four HEAR steps and notice how the conversation feels.
- Pick a view you disagree with and write the strongest possible argument for it in five sentences.
- Once this week, say out loud "I've changed my mind" about something, however small, when you learn something new.
Remember
- Intellectual humility means holding beliefs as firmly as the evidence allows.
- HEAR: Hedge, Emphasise agreement, Acknowledge, Reframe to the positive.
- Argue against the strongest version of a view, not a straw man.
- Changing your mind with good evidence is a strength.
- You can disagree with an idea and still respect the person.
Note: The term 'steelmanning' is widely used but informal; the idea here builds on Scientific American's example of considering the merits of an alternative viewpoint. Research on intellectual humility is relatively new, and Greater Good notes there is no 'quick fix' yet for moments when it fails.
Check yourself
1. In Julia Minson's HEAR framework, what does the 'A' stand for?
2. How does the Greater Good Science Center describe intellectual humility?
3. What did Minson's research find about people trained in conversational receptiveness?
4. Which statement about intellectual humility is TRUE, according to Scientific American?