Life-Ready SocietyEst. 2026
Critical Thinking and Media Literacy · Lesson 7 of 8 · 12 min

Making Good Decisions

University choices, job offers, money and friendships all involve decisions under uncertainty. You cannot control luck, but you can control how well you think a decision through.

Judge the decision, not just the result

  • A good decision can turn out badly because of luck, and a poor decision can turn out well. Decision expert Annie Duke calls judging a choice only by its outcome "resulting".
  • Example: you leave plenty of time for an exam, but the metro breaks down and you arrive late. The decision was still sound.
  • Focus on the process, because that is the part you control: did you gather the right information, consider options and think about what could go wrong?
  • Watch for words like "should have" after the event. They are often hindsight bias in disguise.

Pros and cons, done properly

  • Write the options side by side, not just one option's pros and cons. Often there are more than two choices (avoid a false dilemma).
  • Give each factor a weight from 1 to 5 for how much it matters to you. A pro like "near the beach" may matter less than "strong course in my subject".
  • Score each option on each factor, multiply by the weight and add up. The total is a guide, not an order: if the result feels wrong, ask what factor you forgot.
  • Decide your criteria before you look at offers or adverts, so you are not anchored by the first option you see.

Think in probabilities

  • Most futures have several possible outcomes, each with its own likelihood and impact (Annie Duke).
  • Instead of "Will this work?", ask "How likely is this to work, roughly?" Answers like 30%, 60% or 90% are more honest than yes or no.
  • Ask "Wanna bet?" of your own beliefs: if you had to bet money, how sure would you really be? This exposes what you are assuming.
  • Rough estimates are still useful. Annie Duke's phrase is that being roughly right beats being precisely wrong.

Run a pre-mortem

  • Psychologist Gary Klein's pre-mortem: before you commit, imagine it is the future and the plan has already failed.
  • Spend about two minutes writing down every reason it might have failed. In a group, each person writes silently first, then shares one reason at a time.
  • Then choose actions to prevent the most likely or most damaging problems.
  • Klein reports a study with 178 college students (Veinott, Klein and Wiggins, 2010) in which the pre-mortem reduced overconfidence more than simple critiques or pros-and-cons lists.
  • A group pre-mortem can take as little as 20 to 30 minutes (Klein). Try it before a group project, a trip or a big purchase.

Get an outside view

  • Talk your decision through with a few open-minded people who will challenge you, not just agree. Annie Duke recommends a "decision pod" like this.
  • Ask a parent, teacher or older student who has made a similar choice what they wish they had known.
  • Sleep on big decisions where possible. Feeling rushed by a deadline is a classic pressure tactic in sales and scams.

Practise in real life

Tick each one off when you have done it.

  • Use a weighted pros and cons table for a real choice you face (a course, a club, a purchase). Compare the result with your gut feeling.
  • Run a five-minute pre-mortem on a plan for this month: imagine it failed and list why. Fix the top two reasons.
  • For one week, add a rough percentage to predictions you make ("70% sure I'll finish this tonight") and check how accurate you were.

Remember

  • A good decision can have a bad outcome; judge the process.
  • Weight what matters before comparing options.
  • Think in rough probabilities, not yes or no.
  • A pre-mortem helps you spot problems before they happen.
  • Ask people who will challenge you, not just agree.
Note: The weighted pros and cons method is a general technique explained here without a single authoritative source. The pre-mortem research summary comes from Gary Klein's own article; independent studies of the method are fewer.

Check yourself

1. What is a pre-mortem?

2. In Veinott, Klein and Wiggins's study, what did the pre-mortem do compared with other methods?

3. You choose a sensible route home, but an unexpected accident makes you late. According to Annie Duke's idea of 'resulting', what is the mistake to avoid?

4. Why should you set your decision criteria before looking at options?